Question 2:
In the following questions, a sentence with four highlighted words indicated by A, B, C and D are given. More than one of these four words are either wrongly spelled or inappropriately used. Find out the words which are wrongly spelled or inappropriate (if any). If all the words given in bold are correctly spelled and appropriate in the context of the sentence, (All are correct) as your answer.
People who experiences (a) this positive energy from us are reminded of their personal positive qualities, even if these qualities are different from ours, and get inspired to imbibe (b) the same and put them into practise (c), although this may not even be our conscious (d) intention in the first place, we just have a general pure, positive, intention towards everything and everyone around us.
In the following questions, a sentence with four highlighted words indicated by A, B, C and D are given. More than one of these four words are either wrongly spelled or inappropriately used. Find out the words which are wrongly spelled or inappropriate (if any). If all the words given in bold are correctly spelled and appropriate in the context of the sentence, (All are correct) as your answer.
People who experiences (a) this positive energy from us are reminded of their personal positive qualities, even if these qualities are different from ours, and get inspired to imbibe (b) the same and put them into practise (c), although this may not even be our conscious (d) intention in the first place, we just have a general pure, positive, intention towards everything and everyone around us.
Question 4:
Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Both mainstream and social media are full of bad language. Bad language not as in indelicate four-letter words which oughtn’t to be used in polite company, but bad language as in the wrong use of everyday words. The other day there was a large ad in the newspaper for online degree courses being conducted under the aegis of a renowned Indian university. The courses being offered were for MBA, MCom, BCom and MA degrees, and the headline of the advertisement read: ‘A reputed online degree from’ and gave the name of the university.
The adjective ‘reputed’ means alleged, something which is said to be so but is not so in fact. Something, or someone, who is worthy of repute, or has a good reputation is said to be ‘reputable’, not reputed, which has a connotation contrary to what is sought to be conveyed. This confusion between reputed and reputable, which are antonyms, or opposing words to each other, is common in spoken and written communication. But in this particular case the error was unintentionally being endorsed, and given official sanction, by an institution of advanced learning.
So big deal. Why be so pernicketyabout the use of language and the meaning of words? Why can’t we be like Lewis Carroll’s Humpty Dumpty who proudly proclaimed, “When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.” After all, as Humpty went on to ask, should we be the master of language, or should language be our master, whose rules we must follow? Language, the bridge, or link, which joins us to each other and with what we call society as a whole, is based on a set of common rules we must all follow if we are to understand and make sense of each other at all. If, like Humpty Dumpty, we make language follow our rules, instead of the other way round, language becomes a barrier not a bridge between us. Which is exactly what is happening between those who impart opposing meanings to words like ‘liberalism’, ‘secularist’, ‘dissent’, ‘nationalism’, among others. All of which might make us ask whether ours is a reputable democracy, or a reputed one. Or are the two interchangeable?
Which of the following best expresses the meaning of “pernickety” as used in the passage?
Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Both mainstream and social media are full of bad language. Bad language not as in indelicate four-letter words which oughtn’t to be used in polite company, but bad language as in the wrong use of everyday words. The other day there was a large ad in the newspaper for online degree courses being conducted under the aegis of a renowned Indian university. The courses being offered were for MBA, MCom, BCom and MA degrees, and the headline of the advertisement read: ‘A reputed online degree from’ and gave the name of the university.
The adjective ‘reputed’ means alleged, something which is said to be so but is not so in fact. Something, or someone, who is worthy of repute, or has a good reputation is said to be ‘reputable’, not reputed, which has a connotation contrary to what is sought to be conveyed. This confusion between reputed and reputable, which are antonyms, or opposing words to each other, is common in spoken and written communication. But in this particular case the error was unintentionally being endorsed, and given official sanction, by an institution of advanced learning.
So big deal. Why be so pernicketyabout the use of language and the meaning of words? Why can’t we be like Lewis Carroll’s Humpty Dumpty who proudly proclaimed, “When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.” After all, as Humpty went on to ask, should we be the master of language, or should language be our master, whose rules we must follow? Language, the bridge, or link, which joins us to each other and with what we call society as a whole, is based on a set of common rules we must all follow if we are to understand and make sense of each other at all. If, like Humpty Dumpty, we make language follow our rules, instead of the other way round, language becomes a barrier not a bridge between us. Which is exactly what is happening between those who impart opposing meanings to words like ‘liberalism’, ‘secularist’, ‘dissent’, ‘nationalism’, among others. All of which might make us ask whether ours is a reputable democracy, or a reputed one. Or are the two interchangeable?
Which of the following best expresses the meaning of “pernickety” as used in the passage?
Question 5:
Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Both mainstream and social media are full of bad language. Bad language not as in indelicate four-letter words which oughtn’t to be used in polite company, but bad language as in the wrong use of everyday words. The other day there was a large ad in the newspaper for online degree courses being conducted under the aegis of a renowned Indian university. The courses being offered were for MBA, MCom, BCom and MA degrees, and the headline of the advertisement read: ‘A reputed online degree from’ and gave the name of the university.
The adjective ‘reputed’ means alleged, something which is said to be so but is not so in fact. Something, or someone, who is worthy of repute, or has a good reputation is said to be ‘reputable’, not reputed, which has a connotation contrary to what is sought to be conveyed. This confusion between reputed and reputable, which are antonyms, or opposing words to each other, is common in spoken and written communication. But in this particular case the error was unintentionally being endorsed, and given official sanction, by an institution of advanced learning.
So big deal. Why be so pernicketyabout the use of language and the meaning of words? Why can’t we be like Lewis Carroll’s Humpty Dumpty who proudly proclaimed, “When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.” After all, as Humpty went on to ask, should we be the master of language, or should language be our master, whose rules we must follow? Language, the bridge, or link, which joins us to each other and with what we call society as a whole, is based on a set of common rules we must all follow if we are to understand and make sense of each other at all. If, like Humpty Dumpty, we make language follow our rules, instead of the other way round, language becomes a barrier not a bridge between us. Which is exactly what is happening between those who impart opposing meanings to words like ‘liberalism’, ‘secularist’, ‘dissent’, ‘nationalism’, among others. All of which might make us ask whether ours is a reputable democracy, or a reputed one. Or are the two interchangeable?
How does the author define language in Humpty Dumpty’s character?
Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
Both mainstream and social media are full of bad language. Bad language not as in indelicate four-letter words which oughtn’t to be used in polite company, but bad language as in the wrong use of everyday words. The other day there was a large ad in the newspaper for online degree courses being conducted under the aegis of a renowned Indian university. The courses being offered were for MBA, MCom, BCom and MA degrees, and the headline of the advertisement read: ‘A reputed online degree from’ and gave the name of the university.
The adjective ‘reputed’ means alleged, something which is said to be so but is not so in fact. Something, or someone, who is worthy of repute, or has a good reputation is said to be ‘reputable’, not reputed, which has a connotation contrary to what is sought to be conveyed. This confusion between reputed and reputable, which are antonyms, or opposing words to each other, is common in spoken and written communication. But in this particular case the error was unintentionally being endorsed, and given official sanction, by an institution of advanced learning.
So big deal. Why be so pernicketyabout the use of language and the meaning of words? Why can’t we be like Lewis Carroll’s Humpty Dumpty who proudly proclaimed, “When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.” After all, as Humpty went on to ask, should we be the master of language, or should language be our master, whose rules we must follow? Language, the bridge, or link, which joins us to each other and with what we call society as a whole, is based on a set of common rules we must all follow if we are to understand and make sense of each other at all. If, like Humpty Dumpty, we make language follow our rules, instead of the other way round, language becomes a barrier not a bridge between us. Which is exactly what is happening between those who impart opposing meanings to words like ‘liberalism’, ‘secularist’, ‘dissent’, ‘nationalism’, among others. All of which might make us ask whether ours is a reputable democracy, or a reputed one. Or are the two interchangeable?
How does the author define language in Humpty Dumpty’s character?
